Healthy body tissue (immune system) rejects destructive germs.
All truth goes through three stages ...ridiculed...violently rejected...third, accepted as self-evident.
~ Arthur Schopenhauer
Germ Theory | Pleomorphic L-forms | Autoimmune | Iron Metabolism |
Germs can only take effect and do their destructive work in tissue that is unable to reject them.
So this makes germs the indirect or a contributing factor of disease. The direct cause of disease is unhealthy body tissue that is unable to reject the germ (a weak immune system). The best solution is to strengthen the body tissue.
So the biggest problem with germ theory is that it doesn't mention the immune system.
Weak body tissue means high in toxins and low in minerals. It does not have the strength to reject attacking germs.
Balanced, homeostatic body tissue rejects germ growth. Germs only thrive in diseased human tissue. Thriving germs are a signal of sick tissue. [The disease happens first. The destructive germ multiplication happens second.] The diseased tissue allows the germs to multiply. The solution is to treat the whole body so that it regains homeostatic balance and can reject the germ growth.
~ The Terrain
The modern western diet is full of a non-organic, toxic form of iron that the body cannot use. (Supplements and microscopic iron metallic filings added to iron fortified
foods.)
One of the first steps to strengthen the body is to regain the metabolic balance between copper and iron, the two essential metals needed for oxygen transport. Bioavailable copper (ceruloplasmin) in the body manages and regulates bioavailable iron.
The problem with excess iron: Allopathic medicine is based on the work of Louis Pasteur... Most people don't realize that there is one thing he forgot to tell us. All pathogens, bacteria, fungus, virus and parasites live, replicate and thrive on an iron buffet.
[10 minutes, ~ Morley Robbins on ExtremeHealthRadio.com]
More at TheRootCauseProtocol.com
There is a problem with germ theory.
On his deathbed, it is reported Pasteur admitted his germ theory was wrong, saying:
...[Claude] Bernard was correct. I was wrong. The microbe (germ) is nothing. The terrain (milieu) is everything......
Terrain refers to the body environment including the strength of the immune system. ~ The Terrain
Although many assume Pasteur's germ theory is proven, this is not the case. Claude Bernard and Antoine Bechamp, contemporaries of Pasteur, proved the opposite of germ theory to be true with experiments that can be repeated today:
...Bernard and Bechamp emphasized the...environment in which germs lived and not the germs...If the terrain was balanced (homeostatic), then germs could not flourish...if the terrain was out of balance, then germs would thrive. In short, germs do not cause disease. Instead, they [germs] are a sign of the diseased conditions of the terrain and not the cause of those conditions....
~ The Terrain
So what is the problem in non-technical language? What is the truth? What is the lie?
Pasteur's False Advertising: Disease occurs when an external germ (microbe) attacks me.
The Reality: My immune system is to weak to reject the germ. Disease only occurs when my body environment is favorable to the germ (microbe).
The Reality: Germs are a sign that there is an imbalance in the body environment. Germs are only the indirect cause of disease.
The Reality: ...disease results when microbes change form, function and toxicity according to the terrain (body environment) of the host....
~ Biological Terrain vs. The Germ Theory
Pasteur's False Advertising: Each germ causes a specific disease. I have to kill a specific germ to get rid of a specific disease.
The Reality: Germs (microbes) change state depending on their host environment. I have to strengthen my body environment (immune system) to prevent the germ from changing into a destructive state and attacking me.
Here is the puzzle piece we are missing:
Q: Do flies cause garbage?
A: No. Flies are attracted to garbage.
Q: Do germs cause weak-diseased tissue?
A: No. Germs are attracted to weak-diseased tissue.
Q: If there is no garbage, where are the flies?
A: Not present.
So the take-away is what? Strong tissue (mineralized tissue without toxins) plus a strong immune system rejects-inactivates germs.
Pasteur's False Advertising: Germs are mono-morphic, they have one state. Environment does not change the germ.
The Reality: Germs are pleomorphic, they change states. They can be inactive or destructive depending on their host environment. A good example is candida, which has a single cell form and a multi-cell fungal rhizoid form.
The Reality: Germs are microscopic self-organizing units of life that can be dormant (inactive) or contribute to health or contribute to disease depeding on the body environment. They can change state from microbe to virus to bacteria to mold or to fungus depending on the body environment.
Pasteur's False Advertising: Germs are fixed and external to the body.
The Reality: Germ life is ubiquitous, present in various materials, living or dead, including all biological life and various soil and stone samples.
From Biological Terrain vs. The Germ Theory:
...Bechamp had discovered tiny organisms (microbes or microorganisms) he called
microzyma
which were pleomorphic
or many-formed.
All about L-form bacteria. Pleo = many and morph = form.
Bechamp uses the terms microzyma
and ferments
interchangeably for the tiny self-organizing microbes.
Interestingly, these microzyma were found to be present in all things whether living or dead, and they persist even when the host has died. Many were impervious to heat as well.
Bechamp's microzyma (microbes), including specific bacteria, could take on a number of forms during the host's life cycle and these forms depended (as Bernard contended) primarily on the chemistry of their environment, or the biological terrain, or to put it a third way, the condition of the host.
In other words there is no single cause of disease. Instead disease results when microzyma (microbes) change form, function and toxity according to the terrain of the host. Bad bacteria, viruses and fungi are merely the forms assumed by the microzymas when there is a condition or terrain that favors disease and these
~ Biological Terrain vs. The Germ Theorybad
microzyma themselves give off toxic byproducts, further contributing to a weakened terrain.
Antoine Bechamp's Definition of a Microzyma: ...the microzyma....is a ferment; it is organized, it is living, capable of multiplying, of becoming diseased and of communicating disease....able to produce alcohol, acetic acid, lactic acid and butyric acid...in a state of health the microzymas of the organism act harmoniously....
~ Antoine Bechamp, The Third Element of The Blood, pg. 229
Please see PDF and web links below.
Bechamp provides significant research details in: Bechamp or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology and The Blood and Its Third Anatomical Element
Polarimetric measurements of the microbes (ferments): Bechamp or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology, By Ethel D. Hume, pg. 112
Cell structure: ...the cell must no longer be regarded as the fundamental unit of life, since it is built up by the cell-granules within it...
Ibid, pgs. 112-113
Beacon Experiment (Cane Sugar / Grape Sugar) and Creosote Experiments (Creosote is phenolic oils produced by wood burning, historically used in preservatives and antiseptics), Ibid, pgs. 134 - 144.
Chalk / Limestone Experiments, Ibid, pgs.173 - 174.
Biological Terrain vs. The Germ Theory |
PDF.
Pacific Northwest Foundation: Antoine Bechamp |
PDF.
Bechamp or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology, By Ethel D. Hume
The Blood and Its Third Anatomical Element, by A. Bechamp
Louis Pasteur (1822 - 1895), Plagiarist, Impostor, You Cannot Catch Bugs, Germs, Bacteria or Candida/Fungi, Bee Wilder.
Cancer and Most Diseases are Caused by Bacteria, A Distant Mirror, Alan Cantwell.